|
MEKARN Regional Conference 2007: Matching Livestock Systems with Available Resources |
Ileal and total tract digestibility in fattening pigs fed ensiled cassava root (ECR) based diets with inclusion of protein of cassava leaves and sweet potato vines in both silage and dry form was studied in a 6 x 6 Latin Square design. In four of the experimental diets dried cassava leaves (DCL), ensiled cassava leaves (ECL), dried sweet potato vines (DSPV) and ensiled sweet potato vines (ESPV) were included as the sole protein source. In the other two diets, protein was supplied from a 50: 50 (DM basis) mixture of cassava leaves and sweet potato vines in dried (Mix D) or ensiled form (Mix E). The six diets were formulated to contain 120 g CP / kg DM and 13 MJ ME / kg DM. Soybean oil was added to the experiment diets to equalize the calculated content of metabolizable energy. Daily feed allowance was 3 kg 100kg 1 of body weight for each individual animal. The daily intakes of DM and dietary components were significantly different among diets (P<0.001). Due to differences in DM intake, the daily intakes of OM, CP, CF and NDF were significantly different among diets (P<0.001). There were no differences (P>0.05) in the coefficients of ileal apparent digestibility (CIAD) of OM among diets but there were significant differences among diets (P<0.05) in the CIAD of DM, CP and NDF. Similarly, there were significant differences in the coefficients of total tract apparent digestibility (CTTAD) of DM, OM, CP, CF and NDF among diets (P<0.05). The CIAD of DM, OM and CP in the ECL, ESPV and Mix E diets tended to be higher than in the DCL, DSPV and the Mix- D diets. The CTTAD of DM, OM, CP, CF and NDF were higher in the diets, which contained protein from ECL, ESPV and Mix-E than from DCL, DSPV and Mix D. The CIAD and CTTAD of CP and NDF in the diets which contained protein from the mixture of cassava leaves and sweet potato vine tended to be higher (P< 0.05) than in the diets that contained protein from cassava leaves or sweet potato vine as the sole protein source in both silage and dry form. There were significantly different coefficients of ileal apparent digestibility (CIAD) of most amino acids (AA) among diets (P<0.05), except for methionine, alanine, glutamic acid and serine. The CIAD of AA in the ECL, ESPV and Mix E diets tended to be higher than in the DCL, DSPV and the Mix- D diets. There were no significant differences in CIAD of AA between dried and ensiled cassava leaves. The CIAD of histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, threonine, tyrosine, alanine and aspartic acid in the diets which contained protein from the mixture of cassava leaves and sweet potato vines were higher than in the diets that contained protein from ECL and DCL (P< 0.05). It was concluded that cassava leaves and sweet potato vine have the potential to improve dietary protein and amino acid supply in diets for pigs.
Vietnam is an agricultural country with a population of 82 million. More than 75% of the population are living in the rural areas and depend on agriculture. Livestock production plays an important role in agricultural production and contributes about 23.0% of total annual agricultural products. The annual growth rate of the pig herd in Vietnam from 2001-2004 was 5.12%, with a total of 27.4 million pigs produced in 2005 (Do Kim Tureen 2005). Farmers in the rural areas of Vietnam account for over 75 % of the total pig production in the country. The main feeds for pigs are rice bran, maize, cassava, sweet potato and some other vegetables. Cassava, maize and rice bran are rich in energy but low in protein and essential amino acids. Commercial feeds, fishmeal, soybean meal and groundnut cake are too expensive to be used by resourcepoor farmers.
Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) and Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) are the second and third most important food crops after rice in terms of total production. Because of their high crude protein (CP) content, cassava leaves and sweet potato leaves have been used as a protein supplement for feeding pigs. Earlier studies have indicated the vegetative plant parts may have nutritional properties that should allow them to be used in diets for pigs. Bui Huy Nhu Phuc (2000) showed that cassava leaves, leucaena leaves and groundnut foliage could be used to improve the dietary protein and amino acid supply to growing pigs under tropical conditions. Many studies have concluded that cassava leaves and sweet potato leaves can be considered as potentially valuable protein sources for pigs, and can replace fish meal, soybean meal and groundnut cake in growing pig diets (Nguyen Thi Hoa Ly et al 2005; Bui Huy Nhu Phuc 2000; Peter et al 2001). The nutritive value as well as the ileal and total tract digestibility of ensiled and dried cassava leaves and sweet potato leaves for growing pigs have recently been reported (Phuc and Lindberg 2001; Hoang Huong Giang et al 2004; Le Van An 2004; Chhay Ty, Preston TR and Ly J 2003). However, no data could be found on mixtures of cassava leaves and sweet potato vines in both silage and dry form for fattening pigs.
This study was conducted to determine the ileal and total tract digestibility in fattening pigs of nutrients, in particular crude protein and amino acids, in cassava leaves and sweet potato vines. Also, the influence of preservation method on the digestibility was evaluated by feeding the cassava leaves and sweet potato vines in ensiled and dried form to fattening pigs.
The experiment was carried out at the Hue University research farm from May to July 2005.
Six castrated F1 crossbred (Mong Cai x Large White) fattening pigs of about 5 months of age, with an average body weight of 60.2 ± 1 kg were used. The pigs were vaccinated against pasteurellosis and hog cholera, and surgically fitted with post-valve T-caecum (PVTC) cannulas to allow collection of ileal digesta. Pigs were kept individually in 2m2 pens and had free access to water from nipple drinkers.
The fresh leaves of cassava were collected at the time of root harvest or were collected at 90 days after planting, with subsequent harvests at 60 day intervals, and spread out on the floor some hours for wilting. The leaves were separated from the stems and petioles, chopped into small pieces (2 - 3 cm), mixed with salt (0.5 %) and then ensiled with rice bran at 10 % weight of the wilted cassava leaves. The cassava leaf silage was kept in sealed airtight plastic bags with a capacity of 30 kg, and was stored for 2 months prior to feeding.
Sweet potato vines were harvested at 60 days after planting, with subsequent harvests at 20 day intervals. The vines were chopped into small pieces 2- 3 cm long and spread out on the floor overnight for wilting to reduce the moisture content. Rice bran was used as additive at 10 % of the wilted weight of the leaves and also common salt (NaCl) was added at 0.5 % of the wilted weight of the leaves. The silage also was kept in sealed airtight plastic bags with a capacity of 30 kg, and was stored for 21 days prior to feeding.
Fresh cassava leaves and sweet potato vines were collected and spread out on concrete outdoors in the sun for 2-3 days. The dried leaves were collected and milled through a 1mm screen, and stored in a dry place.
The 6 experimental diets were fed according to a 6 x 6 Latin Square and the experiment lasted for a total of 72 days. Each of the six experimental periods was 12 days, comprising 5 days of adaptation to each diet followed by 4 days of collection of faeces, one day of collection of ileal digesta, one day of rest and finally a second day of collection of ileal digesta.
Six different diets were used in the experiment:
· DCL: Cassava leaves, sun-dried
ECL: Cassava leaves, ensiled
DSPV: Sweet potato vines, sun-dried
ESPV: Sweet potato vines, ensiled
MIX-D: Mixture (DCL + DSPV) consisting of 50 % cassava leaves, sun-dried (DCL) and 50% sweet potato vines, sun-dried (DSPV) in dry basis
MIX-E: Mixture (ECL + ESPV) consisting of 50 % ensiled cassava leaves (ECL) and 50% ensiled sweet potato vines (ESPV) in dry basis
In four of the experimental diets, dried cassava leaves (DCL), ensiled cassava leaves
(ECL), dried sweet potato vines (DSPV) and ensiled sweet potato vines (ESPV) were included as the sole protein source. In the other two diets, protein was supplied from a 50: 50 (DM basis) mixture of cassava leaves and sweet potato vines in dried or ensiled form. The six diets were based on ensiled cassava roots as the energy source (Table 1).
|
Table 1. Chemical composition of the feed ingredients (% as DM) |
|||||||
|
ME |
CP % |
EE % |
CF % |
NDF % |
Ash (%) |
OM % |
|
|
ECR |
13.0 |
1.68 |
0.55 |
3.03 |
4.93 |
2.46 |
97.5 |
|
DCL |
10.6 |
29.9 |
6.69 |
14.9 |
36.9 |
7.83 |
92.2 |
|
ECL |
10.8 |
24.2 |
6.99 |
14.3 |
36.5 |
8.02 |
91.9 |
|
ESPV |
9.50 |
19.7 |
6.42 |
15.6 |
41.5 |
14.5 |
85.5 |
|
DSPV |
9.50 |
22.9 |
5.26 |
15.9 |
41.2 |
13.3 |
86.7 |
|
Mix - D* |
10.03 |
26.4 |
5.98 |
15.4 |
39.1 |
10.6 |
89.5 |
|
Mix - E** |
10.13 |
22.0 |
6.56 |
15.0 |
39.0 |
11.3 |
88.7 |
|
* Mix D: Mixture (DCL + DSPV) consists of 50 % dried cassava leaves and 50 % dried sweet potato vine in dry basis. ** Mix E: Mixture (ECL + ESPV) consists of 50 % ensiled cassava leaves and 50 % ensiled sweet potato vine in dry basis. ECR and ECL analyzed at 60 days after ensiling: HCN content in ECR was 20mg/kg DM HCN content in ECL was 152 mg/kg DM; CLM analyzed at 30 days after drying: HCN content in CLM was 128 mg/kg DM |
|||||||
The six diets were formulated to contain 120 g CP/kg DM and 13 MJ ME / kg DM. Soybean oil was added to the experimental diets to equalize the calculated content of metabolizable energy. All diets were supplemented with a standard mixture of vitamins, minerals and trace elements according to requirements given by NRC (1998), added at 5 g kg 1. Chromium oxide was used as a digesta flow marker and was added at 5 g kg 1 (Table 2).
The feeding level during the collection period was set slightly below the maximum level consumed during the adaptation period. Daily feed allowance was 3 kg 100 kg 1 of body weight for each individual animal. The pigs were fed two times per day at 6:00 and 18:00h, with the daily allowance equally divided between the two meals. Food refusals and spillage were recorded, and were used to correct the food intake data.
|
Table 2. Chemical composition (% in DM) and metabolizable energy content (ME, MJ /kg DM) of the experimental diets |
||||||
|
|
ECL |
DCL |
ESPV |
DSPV |
Mix-D |
MixE |
|
Ingredients |
||||||
|
Ensiled cassava roots |
53.0 |
62.0 |
41.5 |
50.0 |
57.0 |
48.0 |
|
Ensiled cassava leaves |
46.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Dried cassava leaves |
- |
37.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Ensiled SP vines |
- |
-. |
57.5 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Dried SP vines |
- |
- |
- |
49.0 |
- |
- |
|
Mix- D* |
- |
- |
- |
- |
42.0 |
- |
|
Mix- E ** |
|
|
|
|
|
51.0 |
|
Chromic oxide |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
Premix |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
Chemical composition |
||||||
|
Organic matter (OM) |
94.0 |
94.6 |
89.6 |
91.3 |
93.2 |
92.0 |
|
Crude Protein (CP) |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
|
Ether extract (EE) |
3.5 |
2.8 |
3.9 |
2.9 |
2.8 |
3.6 |
|
Crude fibre (CF) |
8.2 |
7.4 |
10.2 |
9.3 |
8.2 |
9.1 |
|
NDF |
19.4 |
16.7 |
25.9 |
22.6 |
19.2 |
22.2 |
|
Ash |
5.0 |
4.4 |
9.4 |
7.7 |
5.8 |
6.9 |
|
ME *** (ME/kg) |
13.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
|
HCN (mg/kg DM) |
80 |
59.8 |
8.3 |
10 |
38.3 |
18.8 |
|
*Mix D: Mixture (DCL + DSPV) consists of 50 % dried cassava leaves and 50 % dried sweet potato vine in dry basis ** Mix E: Mixture (ECL + ESPV) consists of 50 % ensiled cassava leaves and 50 % ensiled sweet potato vine in dry basis *** The calculated ME value was reached by addition of soybean oil, which was mixed with the other diet ingredients at the time of feeding: To the ECL and DCL diets was added 30 g of soybean/kg DM of diet To the ESPV and DSPV diets was added 40 g of soybean/kg DM of diet To the MIX diets DCL and DSPV or ECL and ESPV was added 35 g of soybean/kg DM of diet |
||||||
For the determination of ileal digestibility, 12 digesta samples from each pig were taken during the 2 days of collection in each experimental period. On each day of collection, samples were taken after every 2 h during the 12 h period between the morning and afternoon feeding, giving six samples per day of collection. At each sample collection, digesta were quantitatively collected for 1 h in containers through soft plastic tubing connected to the ileal cannula. The digesta were frequently removed from the tube and container and transferred to a bigger container where they were kept on ice during sampling. The samples were then kept frozen at 18oC.
For total tract digestibility, faeces were collected four times per day and kept in a freezer at 18oC. Finally, prior to chemical analysis, individual samples of ileal digesta and faeces were thawed and pooled within pig and period. Sub-samples were taken and dried at 600C prior to chemical analysis. The digestibility of the diets at each sampling site was calculated using the indicator technique (Sauer et al 2000) according to the equation:
CADD = 1 ( DCF/ DCD X ID/IF)
Where is CADD the coefficient of apparent digestibility of dietary component in the assay diet; DCF the dietary component concentration in ileal digesta or faeces (%); DCD the dietary component concentration in the assay diet (%); ID the indicator concentration in the assay diet (%); IF the indicator concentration in ileal digesta or faeces (%).
Food, digesta and faecal samples were dried at 60 oC for 24 h and milled through a 1 mm screen before analysis. Nitrogen contents of faeces and digesta was determined on fresh samples, while the other analyses of feed, faeces and digesta were determined on air-dry samples. The chemical composition was determined according to standard methods (AOAC 1990). Chromium oxide in feed, faeces and ileal digesta was determined according to Fenton and Fenton (1979). Amino acids were analyzed according to Spackman et al. (1958) on an ion-exchange column using an HPLC.
Analysis of variance was performed according to a 6 x 6 square arrangement, using the General Linear Model of Minitab Statistical Software Version 13 (2000). Tukey pair-wise comparisons were used to determine differences between treatment means at P<0.05.
The chemical composition of the ingredients is presented in Table 1 and of the experimental diets in Table 2. The CP content of fresh ensiled and dried cassava leaves was higher than in fresh, ensiled and dried sweet potato vines (Table 3). However the CP content of dried cassava leaves (DCL), dried sweet potato vines (DSPV) as well as Mix D was higher than in ensiled cassava leaves (ECL), ensiled sweet potato vines (ESPV) and Mix E. There was no difference in CF content between dried and ensiled cassava leaves or dried and ensiled sweet potato vines as well as Mix - D and Mix - E. The NDF content was lower in ECL and DCL than in DSPV and ESPV (Table 1).
The content of amino acids differed between fresh, dried and ensiled cassava leaves. Further, the contents of lysine, histidine, isoleucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine and threonine in the ensiled cassava leaves and ensiled sweet potato vines were lower than in fresh or sun-dried cassava leaves and sweet potato vines (Table 3).
The effect of ensiling and drying on EAA of cassava leaves and sweet potato vines is shown in Figure1 and Figure 2.
|
Table 3. Amino acid composition of ingredients in the experimental diets (% in DM) |
|||||||
|
|
ECR |
FCL* |
ECL |
DCL |
FSPV* |
ESPV |
DSPV |
|
CP (% in DM) |
1.7 |
29.9 |
24.2 |
29.9 |
22.3 |
19.7 |
22.9 |
|
EAA |
|||||||
|
Arginine |
0.271 |
1.717 |
1.435 |
1.677 |
1.467 |
1.398 |
1.400 |
|
Histidine |
0.095 |
0.345 |
0.351 |
0.331 |
0.357 |
0.244 |
0.278 |
|
Isoleucine |
0.035 |
1.592 |
1.334 |
1.512 |
1.167 |
1.024 |
1.385 |
|
Leucine |
0.080 |
2.382 |
1.846 |
2.270 |
1.948 |
1.821 |
1.883 |
|
Lysine |
0.102 |
1.298 |
1.133 |
1.258 |
0.967 |
0.833 |
0.834 |
|
Methionine |
0.011 |
0.624 |
0.482 |
0.625 |
0.450 |
0.420 |
0.429 |
|
Phenylalanine |
0.047 |
1.339 |
1.012 |
1.272 |
1.176 |
0.941 |
1.024 |
|
Threonine |
0.124 |
1.171 |
1.078 |
1.217 |
1.244 |
0.890 |
1.082 |
|
Tyrosine |
0.046 |
0.959 |
0.797 |
0.907 |
0.994 |
0.890 |
0.773 |
|
Valine |
0.043 |
1.266 |
1.171 |
1.230 |
1.281 |
0.947 |
1.201 |
|
NEAA |
|||||||
|
Alanine |
0.072 |
1.580 |
1.442 |
1.582 |
1.500 |
1.397 |
1.420 |
|
Aspartic acid |
0.213 |
2.583 |
1.812 |
2.514 |
2.420 |
1.408 |
2.213 |
|
Glutamic acid |
0.355 |
3.572 |
2.301 |
3.601 |
1.828 |
1.668 |
1.564 |
|
Glycine |
0.036 |
1.639 |
1.373 |
1.504 |
0.978 |
1.300 |
1.533 |
|
Proline |
0.015 |
1.128 |
1.209 |
1.370 |
0.838 |
0.820 |
0.867 |
|
Serine |
0.076 |
1.393 |
0.785 |
1.212 |
0.967 |
0.599 |
0.788 |
|
*FCL : fresh cassava leaves; FSPV : Fresh sweet potato vine |
|||||||
All experimental diets had the same levels of CP and ME. However CF and NDF were lower in the DCL, ECL and Mix D diets. There were differences in the HCN content among diets, with the highest content of HCN in the ECL diet.
The daily intakes of DM and dietary components were significantly different among diets (P<0.001). Due to differences in DM intake (Table 4) the daily intakes of OM, CP, CF and NDF were significantly different among diets (P<0.001). The lowest daily intake of DM, OM and CP was recorded for the Mix- E diet, while the highest value was found in the DCL diet (P<0.05).
The CF and NDF intakes were higher in the DSPV and ESPV diets compared to ECL and DCL (P<0.001). The DM, CP, CF and NDF intakes were not different between ESPV and Mix E diets (P>0.05).
|
|
|
Figure 1: Effect of ensiling (ECL) and drying (DCL) on EAA content of cassava leaves (FCL=fresh leaves) |
|
|
|
Figure 2: Effect of ensiling (ESPV) and drying (DSPV) on EAA content of sweet potato vines (FSPV=fresh vines) |
|
Table 4. Mean daily intake of dry matter and dietary components (g/day) |
||||||||
|
|
ECL |
DCL |
DSPV |
ESPV |
Mix-D |
Mix-E |
SEM |
P |
|
DM |
1515a |
1642b |
1519a |
1451ac |
1606ab |
1475ac |
25.58 |
0.001 |
|
OM |
1425a |
1533b |
||||||