Royal University of Agriculture, Faculty of
Animal Production and Health
Phnom Penh, Cambodia
The research was carried out during 2 months from
October to December 2001 in the Research Station of Royal
University of Agriculture in Phnom Penh. The objective is using
diet with different treatment of cassava leave meal (CLM) to
replace dried fish and to reduce the production cost. The parameter
live weight was measured weekly. The trials were randomized block
design with 4 replications per treatment. Chicken were divided into
4 groups fed with 0%, 10%, 20% and 30% of CLM, whereas the feed was
measured daily. The result of the experiment is that there were no
significant different on live weight between control group and
treatment 1 until 8th week of age while the feed
conversion ratio they were better than treatment 2 and 3. The
mortality of treatment 2 and 3 were higher than control group and
treatment 1. Therefore the utilization of CLM in diet of chicken is
limited.
Cassava is a local crop and the growth of this plant is very
quickly in the short time. Every where the farmer grew cassava to
be get only root for human food, where as the leaves and stem were
through away. Gomez, et al. (1985) and Nwokolo (1987) find out that
the protein content of cassava leaves was around 22 % after an
air-dry for a few days. Therefore we are able to replace soy bean
and fish meal into the feed concentrate to reduce the feed cost of
poultry production. After Gomey, et al. (1983) the performance of
chicken by providing diet with 10 or 20 % of cassava meal was
similar to those the control group. Ravindran, et al. (1989) showed
that the performance of broiler can tolerate a level of 15 %
cassava leave meal (CLM) without negative affect on their growth.
Otherwise, the increasing of chicken meat responds to the need of
Cambodian at the present time. The utilization of local feed
resource as cassava for supplying on the feed ratio of chicken is
very important for sustainable of poultry production in Cambodia.
On the other hand, the supplementation of cassava leave is able to
reduce the cost of poultry production. Throughout cassava replace
soy bean and fish meal we are able to increase the families income
and improve the livelihood of the poor farmer.
The experiment was conducted in the Animal Experimental Station of the Royal University of Agriculture, Phnom Penh, Cambodia during October to December 2001. The chicken was reared on the cement concrete floor covered by rice husk. It is used 304 day-old broiler chick "Avian" breed with 47.46g ± 3.32. The experiment was completely randomized design with 4 treatments A, B, C and D and 4 replications in which contained 19chicken/pen. Feeding was ad libitum by replacing a mixture contained 60% of maize and 40% of fish meal with 4 level of cassava leave meal (CLM), 0%, 10%, 20% and 30% in group A, B, C and D respectfully. CLM was the result of these following works: harvested fresh cassava leaves, then chopped in small pieces, after that sun-dried for a few day and finally ground in a hammer mill. Chicken were individually weigh weekly whereas the feed consumption and mortal chicken were recorded daily. Feedings were divided into 2 phases according to the age: first from 0-4week and second from 4-8week. The feed formulation was shown in the Table 1.
|
Table 1: Feed formulation |
||||||||
|
Ingredients |
Feeding in the 1st phase (0-4week) |
Feeding in the 2nd phase (4-8week) |
||||||
|
CLM0 |
CLM10 |
CLM20 |
CLM30 |
CLM0 |
CLM10 |
CLM20 |
CLM30 |
|
|
Mixture (maize + fish) |
60 |
50 |
40 |
30 |
50 |
40 |
30 |
20 |
|
Rice bran |
36 |
36 |
36 |
36 |
46 |
46 |
46 |
46 |
|
CLM |
0 |
10 |
20 |
30 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
30 |
|
Vitamin |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
|
Premix |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
Shell |
3.15 |
3.15 |
3.15 |
3.15 |
3.15 |
3.15 |
3.15 |
3.15 |
|
Salt |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
CP in DM, % |
20.4 |
20.3 |
20.3 |
20.2 |
18.4 |
18.4 |
18.3 |
18.2 |
Detailed result was shown in annex below whereas the overall
result was expressed in the Table 2. The performance of chicken by
different treatment of cassava leave meal during the trial of two
months was shown in Graphic. 1. From starting until the end of test
period, there were no significant difference on live weight by
control and treatment 1; it is similar to the result of Ravindran
et al. (1989) who found that the performance of chicken can
tolerate a level of 15% CLM. On the other hand the control and
treatment 1 have a tendency significance live weight than treatment
2 and 3 (p£0.001). The Graphic 2 was indicated that the feed
intake by treatment 1 and 2 was relatively higher than control and
treatment 3, whereas the feed conversion ratio of control and
treatment 1 were better than treatment 2 and 3. The mortality of
chicken at the end of research was showed in Graphic 3. There was
higher mortality by treatment 2 and 3 due to higher containing of
cyanic acid in the diet.
Table 2: The overall result of the
experiment
|
|
Parameter |
Control |
Treatment 1 |
Treatment 2 |
Treatment 3 |
|
Number |
Start |
76 |
76 |
76 |
76 |
|
Finish |
74 |
72 |
66 |
45 |
|
|
Weight |
`X |
1565.9a |
1604.9a |
1129.1b |
623.1c |
|
S± |
446.3 |
424.0 |
328.2 |
317.4 |
|
|
Feed intake |
`X |
498.36 |
571.37 |
539.04 |
394.79 |
|
S± |
285.17 |
326.27 |
321.21 |
216.45 |
|
|
FCR |
`X |
2.86 |
3.45 |
5.30 |
9.39 |
|
S± |
0.21 |
0.03 |
0.48 |
0.88 |
|
|
Mortality |
X (%) |
2.63 |
5.26 |
13.16 |
40.79 |
It is concluded that the utilization of cassava leave meal in
the diet of broiler chicken is the target of reducing the
production cost of feed. On the other hand it is enhanced the
sustainability of livestock production in farmer family. However,
it is recommended that using cassava leave meal in chicken diet
should be limited not more than 10% due to containing of cyanic
acid and high crude fiber. It is revealed that using 10% of cassava
leaves meal for replacing maize and fish meal brings a benefit
result for the performance of chicken.
Gomez, G , Vadieviso, M Santos, J , Hoyos, C.
(1983)Evaluation f cassava root meal prepared from low and high
cyanide containing cultivas in pig and broiler diets. In Nutrition
Report International, 28:4, 693-704
Ravandran, V, Kornegay, ET, Rajaguro, ASB, Potter,
LM, Cherry, JA (1986) Cassava leaf meal as a replacement for
coconut oil meal in broiler diets. In Poultry Science 65:9,
1720-1727, 19 ref
Nwokolo, E : (1987) Leaf meal of cassava (Manihot
esculenta Crantz) and siam weed (Epatorium odoratum L. ) as
nutrient sources in Poultry. In Nutrient Reports International.
36:4, 819-826, 15 ref
Annex 1: Performance of chicken in the different
treatment
|
Week |
Parameter |
Control |
Treat 1 |
Treat 2 |
Treat3 |
F-value |
P |
|
0 |
n |
76 |
76 |
76 |
76 |
3.51 |
|
|
`X |
47.276 |
46.566 |
47.789 |
48.197 |
|||
|
S± |
3.443 |
3.649 |
3.638 |
2.129 |
|||
|
2 |
n |
76 |
76 |
76 |
74 |
62.67 |
0 |
|
`X |
166.54a |
137.11b |
110.13c |
84.05d |
|||
|
S± |
51.07 |
47.10 |
27.94 |
19.67 |
|||
|
4 |
n |
76 |
74 |
74 |
74 |
79.96 |
0 |
|
`X |
542.2a |
478.8a |
312.6b |
170.9c |
|||
|
S± |
205.3 |
194.2 |
136.4 |
76.4 |
|||
|
6 |
n |
73 |
74 |
72 |
59 |
93.93 |
0 |
|
`X |
997.1a |
969.5a |
611.0b |
292.0c |
|||
|
S± |
364.9 |
321.8 |
176.0 |
180.6 |
|||
|
8 |
n |
74 |
72 |
66 |
45 |
75.63 |
0 |
|
`X |
1565.9a |
1604.9a |
1129.1b |
623.1c |
|||
|
S± |
446.3 |
424.0 |
328.2 |
317.4 |
Annex 2: Average feed intake and feed conversion
ratio of chicken in the different treatments
|
Week |
Parameter |
Feed Intake |
Feed Conversion Ratio |
||||||
|
Control |
Treat. 1 |
Treat. 2 |
Treat. 3 |
Control |
Treat. 1 |
Treat. 2 |
Treat. 3 |
||
|
1 |
`X |
14.45 |
14.94 |
13.50 |
11.33 |
2.63 |
2.93 |
3.83 |
7.40 |
|
S± |
5.11 |
5.13 |
4.13 |
3.68 |
0.51 |
0.50 |
0.57 |
1.66 |
|
|
2 |
`X |
30.68 |
31.76 |
27.65 |
22.11 |
2.71 |
4.13 |
5.27 |
6.53 |
|
S± |
7.11 |
6.51 |
8.24 |
11.16 |
0.31 |
0.22 |
0.83 |
1.17 |
|
|
3 |
`X |
48.07 |
63.74 |
61.41 |
40.42 |
2.33 |
3.39 |
6.40 |
7.81 |
|
S± |
8.14 |
9.86 |
8.03 |
9.28 |
0.38 |
0.29 |
1.55 |
1.10 |
|
|
4 |
`X |
74.56 |
84.77 |
79.49 |
75.79 |
2.30 |
2.87 |
4.64 |
11.07 |
|
S± |
14.11 |
8.74 |
9.02 |
12.47 |
0.18 |
0.35 |
1.90 |
2.95 |
|
|
5 |
`X |
94.39 |
100.08 |
90.77 |
80.68 |
2.46 |
2.14 |
3.09 |
7.18 |
|
S± |
5.33 |
4.90 |
8.08 |
8.77 |
0.17 |
0.19 |
0.36 |
2.72 |
|
|
6 |
`X |
114.91 |
122.51 |
113.73 |
68.23 |
4.59 |
5.44 |
9.15 |
16.12 |
|
S± |
11.74 |
5.41 |
15.02 |
13.26 |
0.99 |
0.90 |
2.30 |
4.45 |
|
|
7 |
`X |
121.31 |
153.57 |
152.49 |
96.24 |
3.03 |
3.23 |
4.73 |
9.62 |
|
S± |
31.46 |
22.51 |
22.51 |
11.50 |
0.84 |
0.89 |
0.47 |
9.55 |
|